GIDOC
07-17 11:53 PM
Thanks for the link.
wallpaper dresses wedding dress sketches
andy_traps
07-27 05:57 PM
Hi,
Is it true that the old (i.e., July 1st - July 29th) filing fees still apply through July 27th - August 17th? The new fees (which would have been applicable from July 30th) will now be applicable from August 18th, right?
Is this true for I-485, I-765 and I-131 forms?
Thanks,
Andy
Is it true that the old (i.e., July 1st - July 29th) filing fees still apply through July 27th - August 17th? The new fees (which would have been applicable from July 30th) will now be applicable from August 18th, right?
Is this true for I-485, I-765 and I-131 forms?
Thanks,
Andy
Augphoto
April 10th, 2007, 01:27 PM
The web being what it is - is there an all inclusive list anywhere for lenses which fit a particular camera body? My particular interest would be for the Maxxum 7D but, I'm sure data like this would be useful for all camera owners.
Sure, there are sites which review lenses and such but, an all inclusive list would make purchasing decisions more informative.
Sure, there are sites which review lenses and such but, an all inclusive list would make purchasing decisions more informative.
2011 designer dresses sketches.
.jpg "cocktail dress sketches.")
solaris27
08-10 08:42 AM
Does any one knows why EB2 India is not approving in comparison to 2006.
As my understanding that USCIS should process application in FIFO and PD.
My PD is Feb 2005 and when I talked to CS he told me that everything is cleared and my case should be approved .
He told me to call after 68 days ( don't know why) if my case is not approved till then.I am seeing peoples with 2006 PD are getting there GC .
As my understanding that USCIS should process application in FIFO and PD.
My PD is Feb 2005 and when I talked to CS he told me that everything is cleared and my case should be approved .
He told me to call after 68 days ( don't know why) if my case is not approved till then.I am seeing peoples with 2006 PD are getting there GC .
more...
suave100
01-30 10:50 AM
I am currently on H1B and in the process of leaving my current employer XYZ Inc. I also have an EAD that I haven't used yet but plan to use going forward. I understand that XYZ will and is rather obligated to notify USCIS of termination of my H1B employment by virtue of which, USICS will take steps to revoke the H1B petition. That being said,
1. Will I (beneficiary) and / or XYZ (petitioner) will receive a notice saying my H1B petition has been revoked?
2. Will it help in any shape or form if I were to fill an (back dated) I-9 form with XYZ indicating that I was already on EAD with XYZ before my termination? In this case, is XYZ still obligated to notify USCIS of termination of my H1B employment?
3. What constitutes a "bona fide termination" and is this even applicable in my case? Should I have a formal resignation letter in place for audit / RFE purposes down the road, if any?
1. Will I (beneficiary) and / or XYZ (petitioner) will receive a notice saying my H1B petition has been revoked?
2. Will it help in any shape or form if I were to fill an (back dated) I-9 form with XYZ indicating that I was already on EAD with XYZ before my termination? In this case, is XYZ still obligated to notify USCIS of termination of my H1B employment?
3. What constitutes a "bona fide termination" and is this even applicable in my case? Should I have a formal resignation letter in place for audit / RFE purposes down the road, if any?
Macaca
02-17 04:51 PM
The Subcommittee on Immigration, Citizenship, Refugees, Border Security, and International Law (http://judiciary.house.gov/committeestructure.aspx?committee=4)shall have jurisdiction over the following subject matters: immigration and naturalization, border security, admission of refugees, treaties, conventions and international agreements, claims against the United States, federal charters of incorporation, private immigration and claims bills, non-border enforcement, other appropriate matters as referred by the Chairman, and relevant oversight.
Democrats
Zoe Lofgren (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=30), Chairman, California, 16th
Luis Gutierrez (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=97), Illinois, 4th
Howard L. Berman (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=7), California, 28th
Sheila Jackson Lee (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=31), Texas, 18th
Maxine Waters (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=32), California, 35th
Martin T. Meehan (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=33), Massachusetts, 5th
William D. Delahunt (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=34), Massachusetts, 10th
Linda T. S�nchez (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=39), California, 39th
Artur Davis (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=100), Alabama , 7th
Keith Ellison (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=101), Minnesota, 5th
Republicans
Steve King (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=22), Ranking Member, Iowa, 5th
Elton Gallegly (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=10), California, 24th
Bob Goodlatte (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=11), Virginia, 6th
Daniel E. Lungren (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=50), California, 3rd
J. Randy Forbes (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=21), Virginia, 4th
Louie Gohmert (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=55), Texas, 1st
Democrats
Zoe Lofgren (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=30), Chairman, California, 16th
Luis Gutierrez (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=97), Illinois, 4th
Howard L. Berman (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=7), California, 28th
Sheila Jackson Lee (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=31), Texas, 18th
Maxine Waters (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=32), California, 35th
Martin T. Meehan (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=33), Massachusetts, 5th
William D. Delahunt (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=34), Massachusetts, 10th
Linda T. S�nchez (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=39), California, 39th
Artur Davis (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=100), Alabama , 7th
Keith Ellison (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=101), Minnesota, 5th
Republicans
Steve King (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=22), Ranking Member, Iowa, 5th
Elton Gallegly (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=10), California, 24th
Bob Goodlatte (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=11), Virginia, 6th
Daniel E. Lungren (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=50), California, 3rd
J. Randy Forbes (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=21), Virginia, 4th
Louie Gohmert (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=55), Texas, 1st
more...
tinuverma
09-01 12:50 PM
Hello Members,
I noticed that the dates on my i-765, i-131 and i-485 changed to 9/1/2008 today. This has not changed since I got my EAD. None of my wife's dates have changed. Does this mean anything? The things I have done lately that might (or might not) have caused this:
- Called CSR to check on status. She asked me to call back as my processing dates are not current yet.
- my lawyer sent G-28 so they could check on any information for me.
Here is some info:
i-140: 9/26/2005
i-485: 7/23/2007
EB-2
Any ideas?
Thanks in advance.
I noticed that the dates on my i-765, i-131 and i-485 changed to 9/1/2008 today. This has not changed since I got my EAD. None of my wife's dates have changed. Does this mean anything? The things I have done lately that might (or might not) have caused this:
- Called CSR to check on status. She asked me to call back as my processing dates are not current yet.
- my lawyer sent G-28 so they could check on any information for me.
Here is some info:
i-140: 9/26/2005
i-485: 7/23/2007
EB-2
Any ideas?
Thanks in advance.
2010 fashion design sketches
webm
01-07 02:40 PM
What will happen if my renewal EAD is still in the process while my current EAD is going to expire soon (in a week's period)?
Can I work during the expired period?
Please help..:confused:
No you shouldn't work during that expired period..and resume to work after you get new extension EAD card.
Can I work during the expired period?
Please help..:confused:
No you shouldn't work during that expired period..and resume to work after you get new extension EAD card.
more...
Blog Feeds
05-27 12:40 PM
Antis point to polls showing more Americans support the Arizona bill than oppose it. But other polls - including new ones from ImmigrationWorks USA and Immigration Voice, show these same voters also support - by wide margins - comprehensive immigration reform proposals that contain legalization programs. Is this really a contradictory result? Maybe not. Americans want ACTION on immigration reform rather than maintaining the status quo. Action can mean an SB1070 or something on a broader scale - even if it is called "amnesty." Here are slides outlining the ImmigrationWorks poll. Keep an eye on polling of Republican voters who...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/05/polls-show-public-wants-action-on-immigration-reform.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/05/polls-show-public-wants-action-on-immigration-reform.html)
hair cocktail dress sketches.
Saurabh_tulika
06-01 02:23 PM
Yes there is away to track your 140.
Goto https://egov.immigration.gov/cris/jsps/index.jsp and create your profile and you will be able to track the process. THere is option to receive email from USCIS whenever there is a change in your file (you have to select that option)
Saurabh
Goto https://egov.immigration.gov/cris/jsps/index.jsp and create your profile and you will be able to track the process. THere is option to receive email from USCIS whenever there is a change in your file (you have to select that option)
Saurabh
more...
pleasehelpme2
02-07 11:41 PM
bump! please anyone reply~ thanks
hot that my design has changed
houston2005
07-02 06:35 PM
To the experts on this forum
I applied for EAD and since last 4 months no action has been taken by TSC on my application. After 90 days, the local office gave me an interim EAD for 3 months. I have also initiated a status enquiry by the customer service at USCIS but haven't rec'd any updates till now. My question here is
1. What other options do I have, since from Oct 1, 06 local office won't issue interim EAD's as a policy change by USCIS.
2. Can I apply concurrently for second application. It seems my first application is lost.
Has anyone earlier been in same boat and has taken any other steps.
Thanks in advance.
I applied for EAD and since last 4 months no action has been taken by TSC on my application. After 90 days, the local office gave me an interim EAD for 3 months. I have also initiated a status enquiry by the customer service at USCIS but haven't rec'd any updates till now. My question here is
1. What other options do I have, since from Oct 1, 06 local office won't issue interim EAD's as a policy change by USCIS.
2. Can I apply concurrently for second application. It seems my first application is lost.
Has anyone earlier been in same boat and has taken any other steps.
Thanks in advance.
more...
house meanings, Fashion
sunny1000
08-31 08:59 PM
no.
tattoo Paul Sisti design sketch,
greatzolin
08-24 03:37 PM
No...you can visit the forums to gestimate when people who filed around your date are getting RN,
...but by the way things are, who knows what USCIS will do next!!
...but by the way things are, who knows what USCIS will do next!!
more...
pictures While some of the sketches
webm
09-26 03:47 PM
I think that EAD/AP are not dependent/tied to the employer?
No.. it's not tied to the employer..
No.. it's not tied to the employer..
dresses Designer Zac Posen designed a
smarth
12-16 12:38 PM
can anyone give answer to the above query?
more...
makeup design courses!
Macaca
12-04 05:31 PM
Old Tensions Test Congress; Democrats Seek A Political Center To Avoid Stalemate (http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB119664099934911173.html) By David Rogers. Wall Street Journal, Dec 3, 2007
WASHINGTON -- Congress returns today to face a pile of unfinished work, little time and many White House veto threats. With the budget process at risk of collapsing for the second time in as many years, there is a sense that lawmakers are back to where they started after the 2006 election: divided by Iraq but chasing the dream of a political center from which to govern.
The best shot for Democrats is to find that center and build coalitions with moderate Republicans to complete Congress's agenda before the holidays. But the bitter divisions with President Bush over the Iraq war make that more difficult.
"The more they take Bush to the woodshed on Iraq, the more difficult it is to bring over moderate Republicans," says Neil Newhouse, a Republican pollster.
Compounding the problem are the moods swings and often combative nature of the Democratic leadership. Republicans tend to march four abreast, even if it means heading off a political cliff as in the 1995 government shutdown; Democrats resemble a family packed into a station wagon and yelling different directions at the driver.
House Appropriations Committee Chairman David Obey (D., Wis.) is highly respected but can hurl insults and convey distrust even as he looks for compromise. "Against my better judgment, I am going to assume you will have good faith," he said of budget talks with Republicans. If there's not good faith? "It's not going to be pretty," Mr. Obey promises.
Democrats, as the party charged with running Congress, would pay the heaviest price for stalemate. But Republicans aren't insulated from blame, especially if they are seen as walking away from compromises important to voters.
The tensions reflect the twin legacies of the 2006 elections. Antiwar sentiment helped bring Democrats back to power while independent voters wanted an end to gridlock in Washington.
Recent votes suggest a bipartisan consensus may be emerging. The passage of an energy bill with tougher fuel standards for cars appeals to independent voters. (See related article on page B1).
In the mid-'90s, when Newt Gingrich's "Republican Revolution" collided with then-President Clinton, he never got more that 240 votes in early skirmishes over defense- and appropriations-bill vetoes. Current Speaker Nancy Pelosi has averaged 275 votes, thanks to Republican support for her efforts to expand child-care and education funding.
This month's deadlines will sorely test the new majority. A stop-gap spending bill to keep the government operating expires Dec. 14. Middle-class households counting on tax refunds don't want to go into the New Year without protections from the alternative minimum tax. And the Pentagon says it will send out furlough notices before Christmas for thousands of civilian employees unless it gets more war money.
Trying to avoid a collapse in the budget process, Democrats are trimming $10.6 billion from prior House and Senate spending bills, which will be packaged into a single omnibus package approaching $490 billion in discretionary appropriations.
Most domestic accounts will be held to 3% increases over 2007 levels. Significant new money is preserved for veterans' medical care as well as $3 billion in emergency funds for border security, both bipartisan priorities. And after falling two votes short of overriding Mr. Bush's veto, a $150.8 billion labor, education and medical- research budget would be reduced by $3.6 billion.
Other major issues include:
Health Care
The spending talks parallel efforts to win passage of a $35 billion, five-year expansion of the State Children's Health Insurance Program. Democrats will move to extend the program with additional funds to guard against state shortfalls at least through 2008. Republicans are seeking a line barring federal aid for any household whose gross income exceeds 300% of poverty or about $41,000 for a single parent and child. Democrats have agreed to such a cap for SCHIP but will want more concessions from moderates before extending the same requirement to much of Medicaid, the larger state-federal health-care program for the poor and disabled.
Farming
With winter wheat planted and farmers seeking operating loans for next year's crops, there is growing anxiety at the pace of the farm bill, which has stalled in the Senate. Some type of extension may be needed, but Chuck Connor, the acting Agriculture secretary, says "there is still time to get this done."
The threshold test could be whether lawmakers embrace the administration's goal of barring subsidies to any farmer with adjusted gross income above $200,000. "That would be an important signal," said Mr. Connor, suggesting that the administration would be more willing then to show some flexibility about Congress's demands.
WASHINGTON -- Congress returns today to face a pile of unfinished work, little time and many White House veto threats. With the budget process at risk of collapsing for the second time in as many years, there is a sense that lawmakers are back to where they started after the 2006 election: divided by Iraq but chasing the dream of a political center from which to govern.
The best shot for Democrats is to find that center and build coalitions with moderate Republicans to complete Congress's agenda before the holidays. But the bitter divisions with President Bush over the Iraq war make that more difficult.
"The more they take Bush to the woodshed on Iraq, the more difficult it is to bring over moderate Republicans," says Neil Newhouse, a Republican pollster.
Compounding the problem are the moods swings and often combative nature of the Democratic leadership. Republicans tend to march four abreast, even if it means heading off a political cliff as in the 1995 government shutdown; Democrats resemble a family packed into a station wagon and yelling different directions at the driver.
House Appropriations Committee Chairman David Obey (D., Wis.) is highly respected but can hurl insults and convey distrust even as he looks for compromise. "Against my better judgment, I am going to assume you will have good faith," he said of budget talks with Republicans. If there's not good faith? "It's not going to be pretty," Mr. Obey promises.
Democrats, as the party charged with running Congress, would pay the heaviest price for stalemate. But Republicans aren't insulated from blame, especially if they are seen as walking away from compromises important to voters.
The tensions reflect the twin legacies of the 2006 elections. Antiwar sentiment helped bring Democrats back to power while independent voters wanted an end to gridlock in Washington.
Recent votes suggest a bipartisan consensus may be emerging. The passage of an energy bill with tougher fuel standards for cars appeals to independent voters. (See related article on page B1).
In the mid-'90s, when Newt Gingrich's "Republican Revolution" collided with then-President Clinton, he never got more that 240 votes in early skirmishes over defense- and appropriations-bill vetoes. Current Speaker Nancy Pelosi has averaged 275 votes, thanks to Republican support for her efforts to expand child-care and education funding.
This month's deadlines will sorely test the new majority. A stop-gap spending bill to keep the government operating expires Dec. 14. Middle-class households counting on tax refunds don't want to go into the New Year without protections from the alternative minimum tax. And the Pentagon says it will send out furlough notices before Christmas for thousands of civilian employees unless it gets more war money.
Trying to avoid a collapse in the budget process, Democrats are trimming $10.6 billion from prior House and Senate spending bills, which will be packaged into a single omnibus package approaching $490 billion in discretionary appropriations.
Most domestic accounts will be held to 3% increases over 2007 levels. Significant new money is preserved for veterans' medical care as well as $3 billion in emergency funds for border security, both bipartisan priorities. And after falling two votes short of overriding Mr. Bush's veto, a $150.8 billion labor, education and medical- research budget would be reduced by $3.6 billion.
Other major issues include:
Health Care
The spending talks parallel efforts to win passage of a $35 billion, five-year expansion of the State Children's Health Insurance Program. Democrats will move to extend the program with additional funds to guard against state shortfalls at least through 2008. Republicans are seeking a line barring federal aid for any household whose gross income exceeds 300% of poverty or about $41,000 for a single parent and child. Democrats have agreed to such a cap for SCHIP but will want more concessions from moderates before extending the same requirement to much of Medicaid, the larger state-federal health-care program for the poor and disabled.
Farming
With winter wheat planted and farmers seeking operating loans for next year's crops, there is growing anxiety at the pace of the farm bill, which has stalled in the Senate. Some type of extension may be needed, but Chuck Connor, the acting Agriculture secretary, says "there is still time to get this done."
The threshold test could be whether lawmakers embrace the administration's goal of barring subsidies to any farmer with adjusted gross income above $200,000. "That would be an important signal," said Mr. Connor, suggesting that the administration would be more willing then to show some flexibility about Congress's demands.
girlfriend -design-sketch-ideas-for-
freedom_fighter
12-15 12:36 PM
Hello,
I'd like to know can a dependent (not the prime applicant) on a pending 485 status, avail unemployment insurance, especially the extended benefits which are being given by Federal govt. to the states.
This is the latest from USCIS :
http://www.uscis.gov/USCIS/New%20Structure/Press%20Releases/2009%20Press%20Releases/Oct%202009/public_charge_fact_sheet.pdf
it says, that unemployment compensation is not public charge.
Does it even apply to both standard unemployment insurance and the extended benefits.
thanks
I'd like to know can a dependent (not the prime applicant) on a pending 485 status, avail unemployment insurance, especially the extended benefits which are being given by Federal govt. to the states.
This is the latest from USCIS :
http://www.uscis.gov/USCIS/New%20Structure/Press%20Releases/2009%20Press%20Releases/Oct%202009/public_charge_fact_sheet.pdf
it says, that unemployment compensation is not public charge.
Does it even apply to both standard unemployment insurance and the extended benefits.
thanks
hairstyles Fashion designers Max Azria
ho_gaya_kaya_?
11-21 07:14 AM
I wonder how will the June\July bulletin change the job market - for technocrats...
Starting from Dec 1st many people will be eligible to switch jobs...people who were unable to do so till now.
And in Jan- many more will get into the "green" zone...
So here is the poll question:
Are you planning to change jobs ?:)
A: As soon as possible- Cant wait !!!
B:Yes- but not immediately - as soon as I find something good
C:Not Really- I am content where I am.
Starting from Dec 1st many people will be eligible to switch jobs...people who were unable to do so till now.
And in Jan- many more will get into the "green" zone...
So here is the poll question:
Are you planning to change jobs ?:)
A: As soon as possible- Cant wait !!!
B:Yes- but not immediately - as soon as I find something good
C:Not Really- I am content where I am.
sanjay02
07-11 01:07 AM
Hi
I am in my 8th year H1-B( came in 1999 first to USA) extension based on pending I-140 & I-485 , I have my 2nd EAD in So now my question is
Is it safe for me to switch to EAD or keep extending my H1-B till I have my I-140 and 485 is approved? My I-140 has been pending for the last 2 yrs because of the FBI security checks etc. Since my H1-B extension beyond 6 yrs is based on pending I-140 and I-485 does it really make sense to keep extending it since I have to pay from my end my employer doesnt pay for it or is it better to be on EAD?
Thnks
I am in my 8th year H1-B( came in 1999 first to USA) extension based on pending I-140 & I-485 , I have my 2nd EAD in So now my question is
Is it safe for me to switch to EAD or keep extending my H1-B till I have my I-140 and 485 is approved? My I-140 has been pending for the last 2 yrs because of the FBI security checks etc. Since my H1-B extension beyond 6 yrs is based on pending I-140 and I-485 does it really make sense to keep extending it since I have to pay from my end my employer doesnt pay for it or is it better to be on EAD?
Thnks
ca_immigrant
05-06 02:16 PM
just looked up and got it
http://www.vbulletin.com/
Thanks!
http://www.vbulletin.com/
Thanks!
No comments:
Post a Comment